Book Review: Provocative Faith by Matthew Paul Turner

Every once in a while you read a book that you needed to read. I needed to read Provocative Faith at this time. From the first page of chapter 1 you know this is not your run of the mill Christian answer book. Right there, in black and white, at the bottom of page 31, Matthew boldly confesses his sin, his struggle with porn. His authenticity and transparency are disarming...and so refreshing.

This book relates Matthew's journey from ordinary, mundane Christian faith to passionate, provocative faith. Matthew challenges the reader to move from the "same ole same ole" faith to a faith that is "centered, stimulating, controversial, challenging, powerful, miraculous, vulnerable, frustrating, and fearful--in a word, provocative" (p. 21).

This book is full of great reminders and insights for all disciples. I am currently examing my call in light of several things that are happening at my two churches. So far, God has been silent. I'm learning to wait patiently as Matthew describes in his chapter "the burning bush isn't for everyone." I'm taking inventory, seeking to "participate in God's dream for (me)" (chapter 10). Is this call where God wants me? Matthew says it well,

If God has given you a dream, and chances are he has, it is imperative that you seek his will on how to make it a reality. Never lose focus on the truth that the dream is a blessing and a gift from Jesus. But in the end, don't you want to hear, "Well done, good and faithful servant"? I want to hear Jesus say to me, "Matthew, you took my dream in you and made it what I wanted it to be; good job!"

I too want to hear those words.

Matthew also reminded me of one way to tune into Jesus and his dream and will for me: meditation.

If you get one thing from this book, let it be this: meditation on Jesus will change your spiritual life. It will rejuvenate your faith like nothing else you will ever experience. More than a great sermon, more than listening to a radio teaching, more than reading this book, meditation on Christ--what he did, who he is, and what he wants of you--will give your life focus, and it will make your faith provocative. And you will begin to know him like never before.

I needed this book at this time. I needed the reminder to be authentic, transparent, and bold. I needed to be reminded to wait on God, that he is good, that he has a dream for me to achieve which he has uniquely gifted me for, and that he will share with me what it is if I'll just sit still, shut up, and listen.

Thanks to Paige Harvey of PS Media Relations for sending me a copy of this book to review! Paige, your sending me this book really ministered to me! Grace and peace!

Book Review: Intercessory Prayer: How God Can Use Your Prayers to Move Heaven and Earth

I really wanted to like this book! This book was handed to me by a true prayer warrior, a woman in one of my churches that really spends serious time in prayer. I had great hopes for this book because of this.

However, I am really disappointed with this book. I found Sheets' style to be inauthentic and "preachy." It didn't feel real or vulnerable to me. Nearly every anecdote that is shared about prayer is miraculous and incredible in some way. Never is there a serious wrestling with unanswered prayer. Overall, if your prayers go unanswered it feels that Sheets' answer for you is that you are doing it wrong.

Sheets' also demonstrates an overall ignorance of biblical Greek and Hebrew. The only scholarly works cited are lexicons and concordances and not a single biblical commentary is mentioned for any passage he discusses. Sheets' does know his way around a Greek or Hebrew lexicon and Webster's Dictionary. Unfortunately this leads him down the path of many Exegetical Fallacies.

The most common fallacy of Sheets' is defined by D.A. Carson as "unwarranted adoption of an expanded semantic field." The following is what Carson means:

The fallacy in this instance lies in the supposition that the meaning of a word in a specific context is much broader than the context itself allows and may bring with it the word's entire semantic range. Exegetical Fallacies, p. 60.

Sheets' regularly brings to bear the word's entire semantic range even if the context does not allow this.

Another fallacy Sheets' falls into is "semantic anachronism".

This fallacy occurs when a late use of a word is read back into earlier literature. At the simplest level, it occurs within the same language, as when the Greek early church fathers use a word in a manner not demonstrably envisaged by the New Testament writers...But the problem has a second face when we also add a change of language. Our word dynamite is etymologically derived from dynamis (power, or even miracle). I do not know how many times I have heard preachers offer some such rendering of Romans 1:16 as this: "I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the dynamite of God unto salvation for everyone who believes" -- often with a knowing tilt of the head, as if something profound or even esoteric has been uttered. This is not just the old root fallacy revisited. It is worse: it is an appeal to a kind of reverse etymology, the root fallacy compounded by anachronism. Did Paul think of dynamite when he penned this word? Exegetical Fallacies, pp. 33-34

He probably didn't, seeing that dynamite had not yet been invented!
But here is another pastor committing this same fallacy! Sheets on pages 169-170 says,

On the other hand, we have weapons that are "divinely powerful" to pull down strongholds, if we would only realize it...The word "powerful" is dunatos and is actually one of the New Testament words for a miracle...And, of course, this is the Greek word from which we get the word dynamite. This stuff is explosive!

This dynamite is explosive for the "destruction of fortresses"...

Sadly and obviously these are not the word pictures the New Testament writers had in mind as they had no experience or understanding of dynamite.

I'll let Carson have the last word, as I believe many popular level books consumed by Christians are full of these "word-study fallacies":

But as important as word studies are, it is very doubtful if profound understanding of any text or of any theme is really possible by word studies alone.

Perhaps the principal reason why word studies constitute a particularly rich source for exegetical fallacies is that many preachers and Bible teachers know Greek only well enough to use concordances, or perhaps a little more. There is little feel for Greek as a language; and so there is a temptation to display what has been learned in study, which as often as not is a great deal of lexical information without the restraining influence of context. The solution, of course, is to learn more Greek, not less, and to gain at least a rudimentary knowledge of linguistics. Exegetical Fallacies, p. 64

Book Review: Blink by Malcolm Gladwell

First impressions, snap judgments, and intuition are the subject of Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. I found this to be a fascinating book. Anecdotes fill the pages as Gladwell relates story after story of the unconscious mind's ability to influence us without our conscious mind even knowing.

Especially powerful are his discussions concerning snap judgment in regards to race and gender. For a taste of the power of the unconscious mind try a computerized Implicit Association Test (IAT).

Particularly intriguing, especially from a Christian warfare worldview is this statement:

The results from these experiments are, obviously, quite disturbing. They suggest that what we think of as free will is largely an illusion: much of the time, we are simply operating on automatic pilot, and the way we think and act -- and how well we think and act on the spur of the moment -- are a lot more susceptible to outside influences than we realize.

I find this quote so intriguing from a warfare worldview because it begs the question of just how much unconscious influence over our daily actions the demonic and angelic realms have on us. What are your thoughts?